"We have been asked to make clear that Ian Upton is not associated with the EDL. This occurred while merging two serarate accounts of the meeting we received. We apologise for any inconvenience this misunderstanding may have caused"
Many thanks to Ian Upton who attended last night's Hope not Hate meeting in Bury and provided us with the following report.
Report of Hope not Hate 'Let's talk about UKIP' meeting
The Met, Bury, July 3rd 2013
The meeting was chaired by Jason Hunter, a Unison union rep
from Burnley.
The meeting began with the speaker stating that police were
in attendance because the EDL were on their way. They were surprised to
discover that the EDL was already present and wearing a suit, sitting quietly
and respectfully at the back.
I asked if the Hope not Hate organisation had lost its way
somehow in defining which type of hate it supported and which type of hate it
didn't ? Out of the 7 people who attended the two obvious UAF at the front
really couldn't help themselves when talking of fascists and shouted over
everyone from the front, quite embarrassing really when you consider myself (and
the Bolton EDL Organiser) were very reserved and there to ask questions and
challenge the views.
The meeting attempted to stereotype all EDL and UKIP members
as fascist or racist. It was quite clear that the outcome was already decided: UKIP would become a target. They
were unable to grasp the notion that because a handful were racist it did not
mean that all were, and were unable to answer the contrary point: Stuart Hall
was a paedophile and a Labour Party member, did that therefore mean all Labour
Party members were paedophile?
One female attendee stated that all Manchester EDL were
'uneducated' because of how they look, before claiming racism because she had a conversation (presumably with an EDL or UKIP member) with a person once who spoke of 'Asians'
generally and stereotypically. She did not appear to grasp the irony.
She was followed by a soon to be standing Labour MEP candidate
who couldn't help but mention that the only time she had received abuse was
when she was knocking on doors on a "council estate" because the
family had the audacity to challenge Labour past record and poor performance in
government in effect nearly bankrupting the county. It's interesting to see
Labour candidates disdain for what used to be their core voters and the very
mention of their residence being "council" shows there own inherent
stereotyping and class distinction.
I am more certain than ever that the far left and those in
these organisations have an embedded interest in ignoring the facts and in
being selective in what they see as hatred.
In Hope not Hate's campaign the hatred that comes from "Islamic Terrorists" to put it in the speakers words does not matter, and nor does it matter that their own colleagues (Union Reps) who are supposed to be representative of all society in the workplace abuse the general public. If they say someone is Racist then it must mean it is true without being challenged or questioned.
The left don't like being challenged and what went down in Bury certainly showed that the inherent vision and determination to label and target without separation certainly clouds the judgment of these organisations
In other words, the meeting was identical to other HnH anti-UKIP meetings: the outcome was predecided, the attendance was laughably low, they attempted to prevent any who disagreed with their views from attending, and it consisted of the far-left repeating the same old stereotypes and platitudes about UKIP. In Hope not Hate's campaign the hatred that comes from "Islamic Terrorists" to put it in the speakers words does not matter, and nor does it matter that their own colleagues (Union Reps) who are supposed to be representative of all society in the workplace abuse the general public. If they say someone is Racist then it must mean it is true without being challenged or questioned.
The left don't like being challenged and what went down in Bury certainly showed that the inherent vision and determination to label and target without separation certainly clouds the judgment of these organisations
I'm sure readers will join me in thanking Ian for the excellent report. Similar reports are always welcome from other HnH meetings!
No comments:
Post a Comment